Girraj Gupta v. M/S Ashok Kumar and Brothers
Case brief
What is this about?
Maintainability of criminal revision petition against interlocutory order allowing additional evidence in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint; reliance on Subramanium Sethuraman vs. State of Maharasthra and another, 2004(4) RCR (Criminal) 349; JMIC Pehowa order dated 11.02.2020; examination of additional witness (Clerk Subhash Chand) omitted from list of witnesses; petition dismissed as not maintainable; Punjab and Haryana High Court, single judge (Shalini Singh Nagpal, J.), decided 03.07.2026; no appearance for petitioner.
What did the court decide?
In view of the law laid down in Subramanium Sethuraman vs. State of Maharasthra and another, 2004(4) RCR (Criminal) 349, the impugned order being interlocutory in nature, the revision petition is not maintainable. ¶17