Petitioner sought to withdraw a petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court; counsel stated the petition would not be pursued and it was dismissed as withdrawn with pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.
Date of Decision: 06.03.2026
...Petitioner
Versus
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU
Present:Mr. Navrajdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Special Public Prosecutor with Ms. Indu Bala Sharma and Mr. Vinayak Atri, Advocates for the respondent-NCB.
MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn, at this stage.
Ordered accordingly.
All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(MANDEEP PANNU) 06.03.2026 JUDGE Anu
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
ANU 2026.03.06 12:04 I am the author of this document Chandigarh
Mandeep Pannu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
