Anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 BNSS in an FIR under BNS sections; the FIR had already been quashed by a co-ordinate Bench, rendering the petition infructuous, and it was disposed of as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
101
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
-.-
CRM-M-44643-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 06.03.2025
Soma Rani ....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab ....Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU
Present: Ms. Harmanpreet Kaur, Advocate for
Mr. Amandeep Chhabra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG Punjab.
-.-
MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral)
March 06, 2026 (MANDEEP PANNU) tripti JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No
TRIPTI SAINI 2026.03.06 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail is still required when the underlying FIR has been quashed by a co-ordinate bench.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Soma Rani
State of Punjab
Mandeep Pannu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
