Dismissed¶27

Meenu & Anr. v. Mange Ram & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC5 Sept 2025RSA/6650/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab & Haryana HC, Regular Second Appeal No.6650 of 2016 (O&M), Meenu & anr. v. Mange Ram & ors., decided 05.09.2025 by Nidhi Gupta, J. (oral). Second appeal against courts-below concurrent dismissal of a suit for declaration and permanent injunction; dismissed as withdrawn at the appellants' instance (counsel Ms. Preeti Singh; none for respondents No.1 and 2 despite service); Power of Attorney taken on record; pending applications disposed of. Procedural disposition only - no merits ratio, no citations, no framed issues.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the second appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; pending application(s), if any, disposed of. ¶27

Meenu & Anr. Vs Mange Ram & Ors. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

RSA-6650-2016 (O & M)

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

213

¶5

Regular Second Appeal No.6650 of 2016 (O & M) Date of decision :-05.09.2025

¶6

Meenu and another

¶7

…..Appellants

¶8

Versus

¶9

Mange Ram and others

¶10

…..Respondents

¶11

CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA

¶12

Present:Ms. Preeti Singh, Advocate ( through VC) for the appellants.

¶13

None for respondents No.1 a nd 2 despite service.

¶14

NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)

¶15

The appellants/plaintiffs h a s filed the present appeal against t h e concurrent findings of the le a rned Courts below whereby the suit filed by the appellants/plaintiffs fo r declaration and permanent injunctio n has been dismissed.

¶16

On the last date of hearing i.e. 21.8.2025 the following

¶17

order wa s passed by this Court :-

¶18

“Learned co u nsel appearing for the appellants submits that she has received telephonic instructio n s from the appellants to withdraw the present s econd appeal. However, she seeks time to file her Vakalatnama in order to do the same.

¶19

When it is poin t ed out to learned counsel for the appellant that a s i milar request had also been made by her on the p r evious date i.e. 20.07.2023,

¶20

VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.05 17.08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶21

RSA-6650-2016 (O & M) 2

¶22

learned counsel un d ertakes that the she will definitely file Vakalat n ama in the Registry within a period of one week fr o m today.

¶23

Adjourned to 0 5 .09.2025.”

¶24

Today Power of Attorney o n behalf of appellants has been file d , which is taken on record.

¶25

Learned counsel for the ap p ellants submits that she has instructions to withdraw the present ap p eal and therefore prays for withdrawal of the same.

¶26

Permitted to do so.

¶27

Dismissed as withdrawn.

¶28

Pending application(s), if an y , shall stands disposed of.

¶29

Septemb e r 05, 2025 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE

¶30

Whether sp e aking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Re p ortable Yes / No

¶31

VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.05 17.08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document