Disposed¶33

Satnarain v. Dharam Chand

Punjab & Haryana HC5 Dec 2025RSA/3352/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second appeal — ejectment/eviction of tenant — appeal disposed of as infructuous upon tenant vacating demised premises — delay condonation (19 days re-filing; 3 days filing) — prayer for reasonable time to vacate — no adjudication on merits — Punjab & Haryana High Court, single Judge, oral unreasoned order — RSA-3352-2017 (O & M).

What did the court decide?

Learned counsel for the respondent, on telephonic instructions, informed the Court that the tenant has vacated the demised premises; in view of that statement the present second appeal has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. ¶33

Satnarain Vs Dharam Chand — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

RSA-3352 -2017 (O & M)

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

207

¶5

Regular Second Appeal No.3352 of 2017 (O & M) Date of decision :-05.12.2025

Satnarain

…..Appellant

Versus

Dharam Chand

…..Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA

¶12

Present:None for the appellant.

¶13

Mr. R.D. Yadav, Advocate fo r the respondent.

¶14

NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)

¶15

The tenant is in second a p peal against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned C o urts below, whereby the suit filed by t he respondent/plaintiff for eje c tment of the appellant from the demi s ed premises has been decreed b y both the Courts below.

¶16

On 30.10.2017, following o r der was passed by this Court

¶17

¶18

“ CM No.8114-C of 2017

¶19

This is an app l ication for making good the deficiency in court fe e. Since the court fee has been made good, the application stands disposed of.

¶20

CM No.8115-C of 2017

¶21

For the re a sons mentioned in the application, delay o f 19 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned.

¶22

Application sta n ds disposed of.

¶23

VIJAY ASIJA 2025.12.05 18.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶24

¶25

RSA-3352 -2017 (O & M)

¶26

CM No.8116-C of 2017

¶27

For the re a sons mentioned in the application, delay of 3 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

¶28

Application sta n ds disposed of. RSA-3352-2017

¶29

After arguing this case for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer only for gr a nting reasonable time for vacating the premises.

¶30

Notice of motio n for 06.11.2017. Dasti as well.”

¶31

Learned counsel for the respondent, on telephonic instructions, informs this Court that t he tenant has vacated the

¶32

demised p remises.

¶33

In view of the statement ma d e by learned counsel for the responde n t, the present appeal has beco m e infructuous and is hereby disposed of accordingly.

¶34

Pending application(s), if an y , shall stand(s) disposed of.

¶35

Decembe r 05, 2025 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE

¶36

Whether sp e aking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Re p ortable Yes / No

¶37

VIJAY ASIJA 2025.12.05 18.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Satnarain v. Dharam Chand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satnarain v. Dharam Chand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Onkar Vs Vijay Kumar and Anr.

Umesh and Others Vs Sanjay Singh and Others

Sarto (Now Deceased) through Her Legal Heirs Vs Jeet Singh and Ors.

Ravinder Singh Vs Dr Sumita Misra and Others

Mahender Singh Vs Rakesh Singh

Maan Singh Vs Bhoop Singh and Ors.