Dismissed¶16

Lakhmi Dass and Anr. v. State of Haryana and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC3 Jul 2025CWP/9329/2002

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Lakhmi Dass v. State of Haryana and others; CWP-9329-2002 (O&M); Punjab and Haryana High Court; Justice Jagmohan Bansal; writ petition Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; restraint on promotion of respondent Nos. 5 to 20 from Senior Accountant to Accounts Manager/Development Officer; companion petition CWP-10545-2001 Laxmi Dass dismissed as withdrawn, order dated 16.01.2017; petition dismissed for absence of petitioners and probable superannuation of parties; liberty to file appropriate application within 3 months if cause survives; pending applications disposed; decided 03.07.2025; not reportable.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; liberty to the petitioners to move an appropriate application within 3 months if cause survives. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. ¶16

Lakhmi Dass and Anr. Vs State of Haryana… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

¶1

CWP-9329-2002 (O &M)

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CWP-9329-2002 (O &M) Date of Decision: 03.07.2025

¶5

Lakhmi Dass and another

¶6

......Petitioner(s)

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Haryana and others ....Respondent(s)

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

¶10

Present: None for the petitioner.

¶11

Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

¶12

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)

¶13

The instant petition was admitted with a further direction to hear alongwith CWP-10545-2001 titled as Laxmi Dass vs. State of Haryana and others.

¶14

The registry has put up the matter alongwith order dated 16.01.2017 passed in aforesaid writ petition. CWP-10545-2001 stands dismissed as withdrawn. There is no representation of the petitioners.

¶15

The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondent No.3 not to promote respondent Nos. 5 to 20 from the post of Senior Accountant to Accounts Manager/Development Officer.

¶16

In view of order dated 16.01.2017 passed in CWP-105452001, absence of petitioners and the fact that petitioners and respondents, in all probabilities, must have retired on attaining the age of superannuation, the instant petition stands dismissed with liberty to

¶17

Shivani Gupta 2025.07.04 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

CWP-9329-2002 (O &M)

¶19

¶20

the petitioners to move an appropriate application within 3 months, if

¶21

cause survives.

¶22