Yamin v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Yamin vs State of Haryana and Ors; CRM-A-2721-MA-2018; leave to appeal granted; main appeal admitted; judgment dated 25.01.2016/04.02.2016; Section 302 IPC; personal bond Rs. 25,000; one surety Rs. 25,000; attendance bond within two months; respondent No. 2 appeal against conviction pending; CRA-S-772-SB-2016; Anoop Chitkara; Sukhvinder Kaur; order dated 01.12.2025; bond conditions; Trial Court/Duty Magistrate.
What did the court decide?
Leave to appeal granted and main appeal admitted (to be heard along with CRA-S-772-SB-2016); accused respondents No. 2 to 5 to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety of Rs. 25,000/- to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate; private respondents No. 3 to 5 to execute attendance bonds within two months undertaking to appear if the appeal is allowed; respondent No. 2 exempted as his appeal against conviction is already pending; furnishing of the personal bonds deemed acceptance of the order's stipulations, terms and conditions; Registry to communicate the order to the trial Court without delay.