Allowed¶9

State of Haryana v. Satbir

Punjab & Haryana HC26 Nov 2025CRM-A/1287/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

State appeal against acquittal: leave to appeal granted and main appeal admitted (CRM-A-1287-MA-2015, decided 26.11.2025). Key terms: leave to appeal, acquittal dated 28.04.2015, personal bond Rs. 25,000, surety Rs. 25,000, attendance bond, Duty Magistrate, deemed acceptance of bail stipulations, State of Haryana, Satbir, Atul Gaur AAG, Mohan Singh Rana. No statutory provisions or precedents engaged with in the order.

What did the court decide?

Leave to appeal granted against the judgment of acquittal dated 28.04.2015; main appeal admitted; accused-respondent directed to execute an attendance bond within two months and to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of Rs. 25,000 to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. ¶9

State of Haryana Vs Satbir — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

247 CRM-A-1287-MA-2015

¶2

STATE OF HARYANA V/S SATBIR

¶3

Present: Mr. Atul Gaur, AAG, Haryana.

¶4

Mr. Mohan Singh Rana, Advocate for the respondent.

¶5

��

¶6

CRM-A-1287-MA-2015

¶7

Counsel for the State submits that they have a very good case on merit and there is sufficient evidence on record which is sufficient for conviction of respondent. There is no appreciation of evidence in judgment of acquittal dated 28.04.2015.

¶8

Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the judgment of acquittal is well reasoned.

¶9

Leave to appeal granted.

¶10

Registry to assign number to appeal.

Main appeal

Heard.

Admitted.

The accused-respondent, to execute a bond for attendance within two months, undertaking to appear in this Court, in case appeal is allowed.

¶15

Given above, the accused-respondent shall furnish a personal bond of Rs. Twenty five Thousand only (INR 25,000/-), and furnishing one surety for Rs. Twenty five thousand only (INR 25,000/-), to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate. Before accepting the sureties, the concerned Court must satisfy that if the accused fails to appear in Court, then such surety is capable of producing the accused before the Court.

¶16

The furnishing of the personal bonds shall be deemed acceptance

¶17

JYOTI 2025.11.27 11:15 of the all stipulations, terms, and conditions of this bail order. I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

CRM-A-1287-MA-2015 -2-

¶19

Registry to communicate this order to the trial Court without any delay. In case of failure of respondent to furnish bond, the concerned Court shall proceed further in accordance with law.

¶20

There would be no need for a certified copy of this order for furnishing bonds, and any Advocate for the accused can download this order along with case status from the official web page of this Court and attest it to be a true copy. In case the attesting officer wants to verify the authenticity, such an officer can also verify its authenticity and may download and use the downloaded copy for attesting bonds.

¶21

(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE

¶22

(SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE

¶23

26.11.2025

¶24

jyoti3

¶25

JYOTI 2025.11.27 11:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

State of Haryana v. Satbir

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State of Haryana v. Satbir

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahesh Mani Vs State of Haryana

Preet Kaushik @ Preet Singh Vs Pardeep Kumar and Anr.

Raj Singh Vs Balbir Singh and Ors.

Hari Singh Vs Tejinder Singh and Others

Balaur Singh Chahal Vs Jatinder Kumar and Ors.

State of Haryana Vs Suraj Alias Geja