Dismissed¶15

Vishal Alias Vicky v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC19 Dec 2025CRM-M/13453/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Vishal @ Vicky v. State of Haryana, CRM-M-13453-2025, Punjab and Haryana High Court (Chandigarh), Sanjay Vashisth J., decided 19.12.2025 - regular bail petition under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.) for offence under Sections 379-B, 34 IPC, FIR No. 44 dated 07.02.2020, PS Rajendra Park, Gurugram; dismissed as infructuous following petitioner's acquittal vide judgment dated 01.12.2025; no precedent discussed; no costs or compensation awarded.

What did the court decide?

The petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous, the petitioner having already been acquitted in the trial vide judgment dated 01.12.2025, as informed by learned State counsel. ¶15

Vishal Alias Vicky Vs State of Haryana — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

207

¶3

CRM-M-13453-2025 Decided on : 19.12.2025

Vishal @ Vicky

. . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana . . . Respondent(s)

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

¶9

PRESENT: None for the petitioner(s).

¶10

Mr. Amish Sharma, AAG, Haryana. ****

¶11

SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral)

¶12

The instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, during the pendency of trial, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed here-under:-

¶13

Name of	FIR	Date	Section(s)	Police Station	District
Petitioner(s)	No.
Vishal @ Vicky	44	07.02.2020	379-B, 34 of IPC	Rajendra Park	Gurugram

¶14

On the very outset, learned State counsel informs that present petition has been rendered infructuous, on account of the final decision of the trial, wherein, petitioner has already been acquitted vide judgment dated 01.12.2025 , therefore, same may be disposed of accordingly.

¶15

In view of the statement of learned State counsel, present petition is ordered to have been dismissed , same having been rendered infructuous.

¶16

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE

¶17

December 19, 2025 J.Ram

¶18

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No

¶19

JAWALA RAM 2025.12.22 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Vishal Alias Vicky v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishal Alias Vicky v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajat Khanna Vs State of Haryana and Others

Arshdeep Singh Alias Arsh Vs State of Punjab

Amanpreet Kaur and Anr. Vs State of Punjab

Sher Singh Alias Prince Vs State of Punjab

Mohit Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Baljinder Singh Alias Billu Vs State of Punjab