Disposed¶20

Rashid v. State of Haryana and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC27 May 2025CRA-S/1001/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rashid v. State of Haryana and another; CRA-S No.1001 of 2025 (O&M); Punjab and Haryana High Court; decision 27.05.2025; Justice Mahabir Singh Sindhu; regular bail application dismissed by Additional Sessions Judge, Nuh; FIR No.311 dated 13.12.2020; Police Station Nagina, District Nuh; Sections 323, 325, 506 read with Section 34 IPC 1860; Section 3(2)(va) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989; appeal disposed of as not pressed at this stage; no opinion on merits; amicus curiae (Ravi Kadian) for respondent No.2; Anshul Khurana / Saleem Ahmed for appellant; Kiran Pal Singh, AAG Haryana.

What did the court decide?

None; appeal disposed of as not pressed 'at this stage' with express clarification of no opinion on merits; pending application(s), if any, stood disposed of. ¶20

Rashid Vs State of Haryana and Anr. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CRA-S No.1001 of 2025 (O&M)

¶2

108

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRA-S No.1001 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.05.2025

Rashid

......... Appellant

Versus

State of Haryana and another

¶9

......... Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU

¶11

Present:Mr. Anshul Khurana, Advocate for Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Kiran Pal Singh, AAG, Haryana for respondent No.1.

¶12

Mr. Ravi Kadian, Advocate (Amicus Curiae) for respondent No.2.

¶13

¶14

MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J.

¶15

Present appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 18.02.2025, whereby regular bail application of the appellant was dismissed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nuh in FIR No.311 dated 13.12.2020, under Sections 323, 325, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention

¶16

-1-

¶17

GAGANDEEP 2025.05.28 09:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

¶18

CRA-S No.1001 of 2025 (O&M)

¶19

of Atrocities) Act, 1989 added later on, registered at Police Station Nagina, District Nuh.

¶20

(2) After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to accept the prayer, learned Counsel for appellant on instructions submits that present appeal be disposed off as not pressed “at this stage”.

¶21