Regular second appeal dismissed for non-payment of deficiency in court fee despite a final opportunity granted at the previous hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
113
RSA-859-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision.:18.09.2024
Gurwinder Singh and Others Appellants
Vs.
Ajit Singh Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: Mr. Virender Kumar, Advocate for the appellants.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
On the last date of hearing, following order was passed:-
“Present: Mr. Saurabh Arora, Advocate for the appellants. ****
Learned counsel for the appellants seeks %me so as to make good
deficiency in the Court fee.
At the request of learned counsel for the appellants, adjourned to 18.09.2024.
No further opportunity shall be provided.”
Deficiency in the Court fee has not been made good so far, despite
the fact that it was made clear on the last date of hearing that no further
opportunity shall be provided.
No ground is made out for providing further opportunity.
Dismissed.
( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE
September 18, 2024
Nee%ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2024.09.18 18:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Gurwinder Singh and Others
Ajit Singh
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
