Group of civil revisions and a regular second appeal arising from landlord-tenant disputes were disposed of as infructuous after counsel stated the tenants had purchased the entire tenanted premises, which was not refuted by the other side.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
** DATE OF DECISION: - 18.09.2024** ** I. CR-1320-2008 (O&M) DARSHAN SINGH (DIED) THROUGH HIS LRS.** . . . . PETITIONER Vs. JATINDER KUMAR BEHL . . . . RESPONDENT ** II. CR-1321-2008 (O&M) NARESH KUMAR** . . . . PETITIONER Vs. JATINDER KUMAR BEHL . . . . RESPONDENT ** III. CR-3935-2007 (O&M) JATINDER KUMAR BEHL** . . . . PETITIONER Vs. DARSHAN SINGH . . . . RESPONDENT ** IV. CR-3937-2007 (O&M) JATINDER KUMAR BEHL** . . . . PETITIONER Vs. NARESH KUMAR . . . . RESPONDENT ****
VIVEK PAHWA 2024.09.18 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CR-1320-2008 2004:PHHC:123640 CR-1321-2008 2004:PHHC:123641 CR-3935-2007 2004:PHHC:123642 CR-3937-2007 2004:PHHC:123643 RSA-2762-2013 2004:PHHC:123645
V. RSA-2762-2013 (O&M)
NARESH KUMAR AND OTHERS
. . . . APPELLANTS Vs.
RAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS
. . . . RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - Mr.Sunil Chadha, Sr. Advocate, with Mr.Tara Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner (in CRs1320 & 1321 of 2008) for the respondent (in CRs-3935 & 3937-2007) for the appellants (in RSA-2762-2013)
Mr.Amit Jain, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Arnav Sood, Advocate for, for the respondents (in CRs1320 & 1321 of 2008) for the petitioners (in CRs-3935 & 3937-2007) for respondent No.1 (in RSA-2762-2013)
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners in CRs-1320 & 1321-2008 and for the appellants in RSA-2762-2013 informs that petitioners/appellants herein were the tenants before the Courts below and that the matter is over, as the entire tenant premises has since been purchased by the petitioners/appellants.
Ld. senior counsel for the petitioners in CRs-3935 & 39372007 and the respondents of RSA-2762-2013 is not in a position to refute this contention.
In view of the aforesaid statement made by Mr.Sunil Chadha, Senior counsel, Civil Revisions Nos. 1320 & 1321 of 2008, Civil Revision
VIVEK PAHWA 2024.09.18 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CR-1320-2008 2004:PHHC:123640 CR-1321-2008 2004:PHHC:123641 CR-3935-2007 2004:PHHC:123642 CR-3937-2007 2004:PHHC:123643 RSA-2762-2013 2004:PHHC:123645
Nos.3935 & 3937 of 2007 and RSA No.2762-2013 are hereby disposed of, having been rendered as infructuous.
A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of connected
cases.
| (DEEPAK GUPTA) | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18.09.2024 | JUDGE | |
| ����� | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned? | Yes | |
| Whether reportable? | No |
VIVEK PAHWA 2024.09.18 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Darshan Singh (Died) Through His LRs
Jatinder Kumar Behl
Naresh Kumar
Naresh Kumar and Others
Raj Kumar and Others
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
