Single-judge inquiry where appeal was dismissed in default for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of appellants and failure to file representation despite notice from Registry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-83-1998 ((O&M) Date of Decision: September 17, 2024
Vishwa Nath and others … Appellants Versus
Ram Chander and others …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - None.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
No�ce to the appellants is received with the report of incomplete address.
Mr. Ramesh Sharama, Advocate, who was earlier represen�ng the appellants, has been duly informed vide this Court’s le#er No.8986 dated 24.06.2024, as reported by the Registry. S�ll, there is no representa�on on behalf of any of the appellants. No other address of the appellants is available on record.
In the aforesaid circumstances, present appeal is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecu�on.
September 17, 2024 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Sarita Rani 2024.09.17 04:29 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order
Vishwa Nath
Ram Chander
DEEPAK GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
