First appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as appellants' counsel did not appear despite notice by e-mail, indicating the appellants had lost interest in pursuing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-1910-2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 16.09.2024
Ninder and others
...... Appellants
Versus
Kuldeep Singh and others
......... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present : None.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Despite the fact that learned counsel for the appellants has been duly informed through e-mail by the Registry, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants.
It appears that appellants are no longer interested in the present
appeal.
Dismissed for want of non-prosecution.
| (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE |
||
|---|---|---|
| 16.09.2024 | ||
| adhikari | ||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No | |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2024.09.18 09:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ninder and others
Kuldeep Singh and others
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
