First appeal pending since 2008 with no representation for the appellant after 2015; dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.384
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Darshan Kaur Vs.
FAO No.1656 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision:18.09.2024 .....Appellant
Dalip Singh Chandi and others .....Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:None for the appellant.
Mr. D.R. Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.2. ****
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (Oral)
There is no representa�on on behalf of any of the appellant. Perusal of the file would reveal that appearance on behalf of the appellant was lastly made before the Lok Adalat on 04.05.2015. Therea,er, ma-er was adjourned on several dates before the Lok Adalat as well as before the Regular Bench of this Court but nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing this appeal. As such, this appeal is dismissed in default for want of prosecu�on.
September 18, 2024 ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) renu JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RENU 2024.09.18 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Darshan Kaur
Dalip Singh Chandi
others
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
