Second appeal from 2000 dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant remained unserved at the available address and respondent No.1 had died, with liberty to revive if anything survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
244 RSA-4390-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision : 03.12.2024 NET RAM .... Appellant VERSUS SHIV LAL AND ANR .... Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None for the appellant.
None for the legal representatives of respondent No.2.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
02.08.2024 notice was issued to the appellant. As per the Office report, the appellant remains unserved due to incomplete address. There is no other address of the appellant available with the Court for effecting his service except the one mentioned in the memo of parties and in the judgments and decrees passed by both the Courts concerned and is the same on which the notices were sent. Respondent No.1 is stated to have died.
03.12.2024 (ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No
AMAN JAIN 2024.12.04 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Net Ram
Shiv Lal
Respondent No.2
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
