Respondent's counsel undertook before the High Court not to press execution proceedings until Civil Appeal No.78 of 2024 was finally decided. On that statement, the revision petition and pending applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
226
CR-2519-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 03.12.2024
Rajwinder Kaur
....Petitioner
VERSUS
Harbans Kaur and Others
....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Prateek Sodhi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. V.K. Sandhir, Advocate for respondent No.1.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
( ALKA SARIN )
03.12.2024 jk
JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.12.04 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Should the revision petition be disposed of in view of respondent No.1's statement not to press execution proceedings till Civil Appeal No.78 of 2024 is decided?
Rajwinder Kaur
Harbans Kaur
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
