Transfer petition withdrawn after the parties compromised the matter. Applications to prepone the hearing and for withdrawal were allowed with no objection from respondents No.2 and 3; the main petition was dismissed as withdrawn and pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
131 TA-353-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 29.11.2024
TEENA NARANG ... Petitioner
VERSUS
ASHWANI KUMAR NARANG AND ORS .... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Hari Om Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
CM-21001-CII-2024
CM-21002-CII-2024
ground that the parties have since compromised the matter.
AMAN JAIN 2024.12.03 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
TA-353-2024
29.11.2024 (ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No
AMAN JAIN 2024.12.03 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Teena Narang
Ashwani Kumar Narang
Respondents No.2 and 3
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
