Lehru v. Mahender
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular second appeal dismissed in default for non-prosecution as no representative appeared for the appellant despite repeated adjournments.
What the court decided
S. No.339
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.2398 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision:18.12.2024 Lehru .....Appellant Vs. Mahender .....Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:None. ****
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (Oral)
There is no representa�on on behalf of the appellant. Perusal of the file would reveal that appearance on behalf of the appellant was made for the last �me on 13.11.2019. Therea#er, the ma%er has been listed several �mes but nobody had put in appearance on behalf of the appellant.
On the last date of hearing, i.e. 09.09.2024, following order was passed by
this Court:-
“ On call, there is no representa�on on behalf of the appellant. Purely, in the interest of jus�ce, ma�er is adjourned to 18.12.2024.
It is made clear that if no one appeared on behalf of the appellant or address the arguments on the date fixed, appropriate orders shall be passed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Lehru
- respondent
Mahender
Coram
Deepak Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/2398/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court