Under Order 23 Rule 1 read with Section 151 CPC, the court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal subject to a compromise deed executed between the parties. The underlying appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Application to withdraw appeal allowed; main appeal RSA-1623-2020 dismissed as withdrawn; hearing preponed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AT CHANDIGARH
109 CM-12224-C-2024 in/and RSA-1623-2020 Date of Decision.:17.12.2024 Pankaj Appellant
Vs.
Prasanna+a Sharma Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: Mr. Rajinder Yadav, Advocate for the appellant.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
CM-12224-C-2024:
This is an applica�on under Order 23 Rule 1 read with Sec�on 151 CPC with a prayer to allow the appellant to withdraw the appeal as ma(er has since been compromised between the par�es.
As per oral request made by learned counsel for the appellant, main case i.e. RSA-1623-2020, which is fixed for 19.03.2025 is hereby preponed and taken on board for today itself.
RSA-1623-2020:
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the appellant and the ma(er having been compromised between the par�es, as per compromise deed (Annexure A-2), placed on record, the present appeal is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
( DEEPAK GUPTA )
JUDGE
December 17, 2024 Nee�ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
Nee�ka Tuteja
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2024.12.17 12:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the appellant to withdraw the appeal due to compromise between parties.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
PANKAJ
PRASANNA SHARMA
DEEPAK GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
