The court dismissed the appeal and connected contempt petitions in default for want of prosecution, noting that all appellants had died and their legal representatives had not appeared to pursue the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.103
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
********
Date of Decision:05.09.2024
1. RSA No.2318 of 2002 (O&M)
| Pirthi Ram and others Vs. Mam Raj and others |
.....Appellants .....Respondents |
|
|---|---|---|
| 2. | COCP No.1093 of 2002 | |
| Pirthi Ram and others Vs. Mam Raj and others |
.....Pe44oners .....Respondents |
|
| 3. | COCP No.1434 of 2004 | |
| Pirthi Ram and another Vs. |
.....Pe44oners | |
| Mam Raj and others | .....Respondents |
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:None for the appellants/ pe��oners.
Mr. Amit S. Sethi, Advocate for the respondents. ****
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (Oral)
There is no representa�on on behalf of the appellants/pe��oners. Mr. Sudershan Moudgil, counsel for the appellants has been duly informed, as reported by the Registry. Similar was the posi�on on the last date of hearing.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that as per the informa�on available with him, all the four appellants have since died. None of the LRs of the deceased have come forward so as to pursue this appeal.
In view of the afore-said facts and circumstances, the present appeal and both the connected contempt pe��ons are dismissed in default for want of prosecu�on
RENU 2024.09.05 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
RSA No.2318 of 2002 (O&M) COCP No.1093 of 2002 COCP No.1434 of 2004 -2-
with liberty to the LRs of the deceased to get it revived, in case any cause of ac�on s�ll survives.
A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of connected cases.
| September 05, 2024 | ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) | |
|---|---|---|
| renu | JUDGE | |
| Whether Speaking/reasoned | Yes/No | |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
RENU 2024.09.05 17:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Pirthi Ram and others
Mam Raj and others
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
