Regular second appeal dismissed in default for want of prosecution as appellants did not appear and no legal representative of the deceased appellant was impleaded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.210
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
********
RSA No.986 of 2000 (O&M) Date of Decision:04.09.2024 Swaran Singh and another .....Appellants Vs. Charanjit Kaur .....Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:None for the appellants.
Mr. J.S. Bha�a, Advocate and Mr. Manoj K. Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. ****
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (Oral)
As reported by the Registry, appellant No.1 – Swaran Singh has been duly served whereas appellant No.2 has expired.
There is no representa�on on behalf of appellant No.1 nor anybody has come forward to be impleaded as LR of deceased- appellant No.2. It appears that the appellants are no longer interested in pursuing this appeal.
Dismissed in default for want of prosecu�on.
| September 04, 2024 | ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) | |
|---|---|---|
| renu | JUDGE | |
| Whether Speaking/reasoned | Yes/No | |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
RENU 2024.09.04 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Swaran Singh
Charanjit Kaur
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
