Petition could not proceed as the memo of parties was unavailable and the petitioner's counsel had expired; the court disposed of the petition without deciding any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
104
CR-2343-1998 Date of Decision: 16.12.2024
RANA EXPRESS, NEWSPAPER …..Pe--oner
Vs.
VISHAL HOSPITAL, ETC. …..Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: None.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Memo of par�es is not available either in the case file or in the Mozilla as reported by the Registry, due to which no�ce could not be issued.
Since, learned counsel for the pe��oner Sh. M.B. Rana, Advocate has already been expired as was no�ced on the last date of hearing and details of the par�es are not available, this Court is le' with no op�on but to dispose of the present pe��on.
Ordered accordingly.
( DEEPAK GUPTA ) 16.12.2024 JUDGE pry Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
PRIYANKA 2024.12.16 14:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Rana Express, Newspaper
Vishal Hospital, Etc.
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
