An complaint-in-progress petition was listed for orders as the petitioner failed to rectify registry objections and refile within the stipulated time. No representation being present, the matter was disposed of without further orders.
The petition is recalled; no further order is passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
INCOMP No.5622-2024 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
139
INCOMP No. 5622 of 2024 DIARY No.8896499 Date of decision :-13.12.2024
Gurtej Pal
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
…..Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:None.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
The aforesaid petition was filed on 18.5.2023 by Mr. Dharam B ir Bhargav, Advocate. Howe v er, certain objections were raised by the Registry on 19.5.2023.
As per Rule 9, Chapter I, Pa r t-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orde r s, the petition, on which objection s have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the coun s el party, who filed it, to re-file within a period of 40 days. However , the same was not taken back f or refiling after removal of objection s . On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. F o llowing note was displayed/p u blished by the Registry in the caus e list and website of this Hon'b l e Court on 18.9.2024 and 25.9.202 4 :-
"All the Advocates /P arties are requested to collect the cases as m e ntioned in the list attached
VIJAY ASIJA 2024.12.13 17.45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
INCOMP No.5622-2024 2
below which are lyin g pending in the Objection Counter of DRR Bra n ch and not taken back till today, within one month of the date of publication of this notice, failing which all the cases (except the Caveat Applications) will be listed before Hon'ble Court on ju d icial side for appropriate orders."
Even after the publication of the note requesting the Advocat e to collect his case for re- fi ling after rectification of objection s , the needful was not done. C o nsequently, the matter has been list e d before this Court in urgent lis t today.
There is no representation o n behalf of the petitioner.
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts of the matter, no further o r der is required to be passed. T he file be consigned to the
records.
Decembe r 13, 2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
Whether sp e aking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Re p ortable Yes / No
VIJAY ASIJA 2024.12.13 17.45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Gurtej Pal
State of Haryana
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
