Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. sought quashing of an FIR registered for matrimonial offences at Panipat. Counsel submitted that parties had compromised and sought withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh quashing petition on the basis of compromise. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-48333-2024 in CRM-M-8776-2023 -1-
IN THE H IGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
114 CRM-48333-2024 in CRM-M-8776-2023
Date of Decision: 13.12.2024
Varun an d others
.… Petitioners
Versus
The State o f Haryana and another .... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Govind Chauhan, Advoc a te for the petitioners.
Mr. Surinder Kumar Dagar, D AG, Haryana.
Mr. Himanshu Choudhary, A d vocate for respondent No. 2.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
CRM-48333-2024
Prayer in the application fi l ed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20 2 3, is for preponing the date of hearing i n the main petition (CRM-M-8 7 76-2024) from 12.03.2025 to some earl y date.
Heard.
For the reasons mentioned i n the application, the same is allowed; a nd the date of hearing in the main petition (CRM-M-87762024) is o r dered to be preponed from 12.03.2025 to today itself. CRM-M-8776-2023
Prayer in this petition filed u n der Section 482 Cr.P.C. is for quashing o f FIR No. 167 dated 05.08.2 0 19 (Annexure P-1) registered under Se c tions 323, 406, 506, 498-A a nd 34 IPC at Women Police
RISHU KATARIA 2024.12.16 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
CRM-48333-2024 in CRM-M-8776-2023 -2-
Station, Panipat and all subsequent pro c eedings arising therefrom , on merits.
Learned counsel for the pe t itioners submits that now the matter sta n ds compromised between the parties, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition , with liberty to file a fresh one for quashi n g of FIR (Annexure P-1) on th e basis of compromise.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn, wit h the liberty aforesaid.
13.12.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
RISHU KATARIA 2024.12.16 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 167 dated 05.08.2019 could be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh on the basis of compromise.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Varun and others
The State of Haryana
Respondent No. 2
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
