First appeal from 1991; record lost in the 1996 fire in the High Court premises. Appellant did not appear despite notices, apparently having lost interest. Appeal disposed of with liberty to move an appropriate application if the cause survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:033048
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
118 FAO-952-1991 Date of Decision : 07.03.2024
PUJA BHARDWAJ
......... APPELLANT
Versus
TARA CHAND AND ORS
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : None for the appellant.
Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Advocate for the respondent-Insurance Company.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE
07.03.2024
anju
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes |
|---|---|
| Whether Reportable | No |
Anju Goel 2024.03.07 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Puja Bhardwaj
Tara Chand and Ors
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
