This judgment is a thin, unreasoned order dismissing a pending appeal. The single-judge bench disposed of the matter due to the loss of the file in a 1996 fire and citing the parties' lost interest after a 34-year pendency.
Disposed of with liberty to parties to move an appropriate application, if their cause survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:033041
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
116 FAO-686-1990 Date of Decision : 07.03.2024
MOHINDER KAUR AND ANR ......... APPELLANTS
Versus
RAVINDER SINGH AND ORS ..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : None.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE
07.03.2024
anju
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
Anju Goel 2024.03.07 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
MOHINDER KAUR AND ANR
RAVINDER SINGH AND ORS
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
