Petition under Article 226 sought setting aside of promotions of private respondents. State counsel noted the petitioner had been dismissed from service on 26.04.2011. The court disposed of the petition as infructuous with liberty to move afresh if cause survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:032934
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
205
CWP-1399-1998 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.03.2024
RANJIT SINGH
… PETITIONER
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Mr.Rajinder Yadav, Advocate for Mr. Salil Dev Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of promotion of private respondents.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
07.03.2024
anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No
Anju Goel 2024.03.07 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a challenge to promotion survives after the petitioner's dismissal from service in 2011?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ranjit Singh
State of Punjab
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
