First Appeal from Ordinary Machinery appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as no appellant appeared despite being called twice; liberty granted to seek restoration if any cause survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
255 FAO No.7071 of 2018(O&M) Date of Decision: 21.10.2024
Guddi and others
.....Appellants
Versus
Narender Tewatia and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
Present: None for the appellants. ****
VIKAS BAHL, J.
OCTOBER 21, 2024 (VIKAS BAHL) d.gulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DIWAKER GULATI 2024.10.22 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Guddi and others
Narender Tewatia and others
Vikas Bahl
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
