The High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as the appellants failed to appear on the hearing date and were deemed not interested in further prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-761-1993 (O&M) Date of decision: 21.04.2023
M/s Ram Dhari Mal Jyoti Parshad and others
...Appellants
Versus
Registeree Firm M/s Satinder Nath Radhey Sham
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
H.S. MADAAN, J. (Oral)
Nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the appellants. Similar was the position on the last date of hearing. It seems that the appellants are not interested in further prosecution of the appeal. The same stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
SUMIT KUMAR 2023.04.21 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
M/s Ram Dhari Mal Jyoti Parshad and others
Registeree Firm M/s Satinder Nath Radhey Sham
H.S. Madaan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
