First appeal dismissed in default for non-prosecution as no one appeared for the appellant despite the matter being called twice, with liberty to seek restoration if any cause survives.
None granted; liberty reserved to appellant to seek restoration of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
276 FAO No.1582 of 2019(O&M) Date of Decision: 21.10.2024
Sajida
.....Appellant
Versus
Safiq (deceased) through LRs and others ....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
Present: None for the appellant.
VIKAS BAHL, J.
OCTOBER 21, 2024 (VIKAS BAHL) d.gulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DIWAKER GULATI 2024.10.22 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sajida
Safiq (deceased) through LRs
Vikas Bahl
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
