The High Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution as neither party appeared on the date of hearing, indicating a lack of interest by the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.117
FAO-4201-2015 Date of Decision: 21.08.2024
JASWINDER SINGH ALIAS BANTU
…. Appellant
Versus
ANOOP SINGH AND ORS.
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:None for the appellant.
Mr. Neeraj Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.3.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
Perusal of the file reveals that on the last date of hearing, none had made appearance on behalf of the appellant.
Today also, despite the case having been called twice, none has made appearance on behalf of the appellant, despite intimation having been given by the Registry about the date fixed.
Seemingly, the appellant is not interested in pursuing the instant appeal. Hence, the same is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ARCHANA PURI) 21.08.2024 JUDGE ���� Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
Sonu 2024.08.21 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC
Jaswinder Singh Alias Bantu
Anoop Singh and Ors.
Archana Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
