Simranjeet Kaur v. Yadwinder Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
Transfer application dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated the underlying case before the court below had been withdrawn.
Transfer application dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated the underlying case before the court below had been withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.218
TA-95-2024
Date of Decision: 14.08.2024
SIMRANJEET KAUR
....Applicant
Versus
YADWINDER SINGH
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:Mr. Ankit Kharbanda, Advocate for the petitioner.
None for the respondent.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant transfer application has become infructuous, as the case before the court below, has since been withdrawn.
In view of the submission, so made, the instant transfer application is hereby dismissed, being infructuous.
| 14.08.2024 | (ARCHANA PURI) JUDGE |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| ���� | |||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : | Yes/No | |
| Whether reportable | : | Yes/No |
Sonu 2024.08.14 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC
Simranjeet Kaur
Yadwinder Singh
Archana Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court