Transfer application dismissed as infructuous after the applicant's counsel submitted the main case had been withdrawn before the court below.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.216-1
TA-55-2024 Date of Decision: 14.08.2024
ANKITA ALIAS ANKITA HOODA
....Applicant
Versus
SAURABH TOMAR
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:Mr. Rajat Verma, Advocate for the applicant.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant transfer application has become infructuous, as the main case has since been withdrawn, before the court below.
In view of the submission, so made, the instant transfer application is hereby dismissed, being infructuous.
| 14.08.2024 | (ARCHANA PURI) JUDGE |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| ���� | |||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : | Yes/No | |
| Whether reportable | : | Yes/No |
Sonu 2024.08.14 16:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC
Ankita alias Ankita Hooda
Saurabh Tomar
Archana Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
