Appeal dismissed in default for want of prosecution; appellant made no appearance since 2015, indicating loss of interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.384
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No.3310 of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision:18.09.2024 Karamjit Kaur .....Appellant
Vs. Dalip Singh Chandi and others .....Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:None for the appellant.
Mr. D.R. Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.2. ****
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (Oral)
There is no representa�on on behalf of any of the appellant. Perusal of the file would reveal that appearance on behalf of the appellant was lastly made before the Lok Adalat on 04.05.2015. Therea,er, ma-er was adjourned on several dates before the Lok Adalat as well as before the Regular Bench of this Court but nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is no longer interested in pursuing this appeal. As such, this appeal is dismissed in default for want of prosecu�on.
September 18, 2024 ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) renu JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RENU 2024.09.18 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Karamjit Kaur
Dalip Singh Chandi
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
