First appeal from 1995 dismissed for non-prosecution as appellants failed to appear despite repeated opportunities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[103] IN THE HIGH COURT OF P UNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIG A RH
FAO-20 2 0-1995 Date of D ecision : 10.12.2024
Jaswant S ingh and others …Appellants versus Harjeet S i ngh and others ….Respondents
Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: None.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
[1] No one has caused appear a nce on behalf of the appella n ts. Same wa s the position on the last date o f hearing and even prior thereto . It appears t h at the appellants are no longe r interested in pursuing the pre s ent appeal.
[2] Dismissed for non-prosecuti o n.
(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 10.12.20 2 4 ‘R. Sharma' Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.12.10 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Jaswant Singh and others
Harjeet Singh and others
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
