Revision petition filed in a pending civil suit; counsel stated the main suit had since been decided, rendering the petition infructuous, and the High Court disposed of it accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[132] IN THE HIGH COURT OF P UNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIG A RH
CR-1334 - 2017 (O&M) Date of D ecision : 09.12.2024
Buta Sin g h and another …Petitioners
versus
Bahadur S ingh and another ….Respondents
Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: Mr. Sandeep Singh Deol, A d vocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Yatin Bunger, Advocate for the respondents.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
[1] At the outset, counsel for th e petitioners informs to this Cou r t that since the main suit already stands decided, hence the present revisio n petition has become rendered infructuous .
[2] Ordered accordingly.
[3] All pending miscellaneous a p plication(s), if any, also stand s disposed o ff .
(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE
09.12.20 2 4 ‘R. Sharma'
Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.12.09 17:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Buta Singh and another
Bahadur Singh and another
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
