Appeal dismissed by oral order due to non-prosecution as the appellant expressed lack of interest in pursuing the matter without appearing in court.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[103] IN THE HIGH COURT OF P UNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIG A RH
FAO-14 6 5-1994 Date of D ecision : 09.12.2024
Raj Garg …Appellant versus Gian Sin g h and others ….Respondents
Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: None.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
[1] No one has caused appearan c e on behalf of the appellant. S a me was the p osition on the last date of hearing. It appears that the appella n t is no longer interested in pursuing the prese n t appeal.
[2] Dismissed for non-prosecuti o n.
(PANKAJ JAIN)
JUDGE
09.12.20 2 4 ‘R. Sharma'
Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2024.12.09 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Raj Garg
Gian Singh
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
