A short order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing the petition because the issue was already decided against the petitioners in a previous judgment dated 16.10.2023.
The petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:005372
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
119 CWP-909-2024 Date of Decision: 16.01.2024
Usha Devi and others …Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and another …Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present:Mr. Rahul Deswal, Advocate for the petitioner
Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)
It is not disputed at the Bar that the issue at hand stands already decided by this Court against the petitioners vide judgment dated 16.10.2023 rendered in CWP-22244-2023 titled Ravinder Rathee and others v. State of Haryana and another.
In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the petition.
Dismissed.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE
16.01.2024 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PAYAL 2024.01.16 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ravinder Rathee and others v. State of Haryana and anotherReferred¶12
CWP-22244-2023 titled Ravinder Rathee and others v. State of Haryana and another
Usha Devi and others
State of Haryana and another
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
