Petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a representation to the second respondent raising the same grievance. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:PHHC:004391
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
132
CWP No.808 of 2024
Date of Decision : 15.1.2024
Anil Kumar and others
..... Petitioners
versus
State of Haryana and others
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present: Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate, for the petitioners
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J. (ORAL):
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a representation to the second respondent raising the grievance raised in the instant petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty prayed for.
In case, such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided
within a period of six weeks of its filing.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE
15.1.2024
A��w���
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Ashwani Kumar 2024.01.15 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Anil Kumar and others
State of Haryana and others
Tribhuvan Dahiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
