Disposed

Shiv Kumar v. State of Haryana and Another

Punjab & Haryana HC16 Jan 2024CWP/907/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought promotion to the post of Statistical Assistant. The court, without examining merits, directed the Director, Secondary Education, Haryana, to decide the pending representation dated 18.10.2023 within three months and pay costs if delayed.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.2 to decide the pending representation dated 18.10.2023 by a speaking order within three months; costs of Rs. 25,000 payable for delay.

Shiv Kumar Vs State of Haryana and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

2024:PHHC:005417

CWP-907-2024

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

118 CWP-907-2024 Date of Decision: 16.01.2024

Shiv Kumar

…Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s)

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA

¶11

Present:Mr. Mange Ram Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner

¶12

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana

¶13

¶14

TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)

¶15

This petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Statistical Assistant w.e.f. 01.07.2008 along with all financial benefits and grant benefit of ACP after eight years from 01.08.2015.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.2 is directed to decide the pending representation, dated 18.10.2023, Annexure P-1, in a specified period.

¶17

Notice of motion.

¶18

PAYAL 2024.01.16 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

2024:PHHC:005417

CWP-907-2024

-2-

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana, appearing on advance notice, submits that the pending representation shall be decided by respondent No.2 expeditiously.

¶23

In view thereof, without going into merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/Director, Secondary Education, Haryana, to consider and decide the pending representation dated 18.10.2023, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

¶24

In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹25,000 to the petitioner.

¶25

(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 16.01.2024 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No

¶26

PAYAL 2024.01.16 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Shiv Kumar v. State of Haryana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiv Kumar v. State of Haryana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Seema Rani Alias Seema Devi and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Neha Rani Vs State of Haryana and Others

Anil Kumar and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Tara Chand and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Usha Devi and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Punam Vs State of Haryana and Another