Petitioner sought 5 additional socio-economic criteria marks to cross the EWS category cutoff in a Haryana Staff Selection Commission recruitment. The reply showed he had already received the 5 socio-economic marks and scored 57 against the last selected candidate's 60. Unable to controvert this, the petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
224
CWP-8259-2020(O&M) Date of Decision:08.08.2024
Ravikant
....Petitioner
Versus
Haryana Staff Selection Commission
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. Vikram Sehoran, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG Haryana
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
August 08, 2024 dinesh
Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DINESH 2024.08.13 00:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Was the petitioner entitled to 5 additional socio-economic criteria marks to exceed the EWS cutoff in the HSSC selection?
Ravikant
Haryana Staff Selection Commission
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
