Writ petition by a contract employee challenging action concerning her service. With the petitioner unrepresented on repeated dates, having left service and gone abroad, the court concluded she had lost interest and dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
219 CWP-7 3 22-2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 07.08.2024
Krishna Devi ..Petitioner
Versus
State of Hary a na and others ..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: N one for the petitioner. M r. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryan a * ***** *
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J (Oral)
( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) 07.08.2024 JUDGE ashok W hether speaking/reasoned : Y es/No W hether reportable : Y es/No
ASHOK KUMAR 2024.08.08 13:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Krishna Devi
State of Haryana and others
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
