Petitioners sought promotion relief under Articles 226/227. The Court found the petition infructuous as petitioners were already promoted to Head Constable pending the petition.
Petition dismissed as being neither fit nor proper in the eye of any court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
324
CWP-7604-2001
Date of Decision : 08.05.2024
MALKIAT SINGH AND ORS … PETITIONERS
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Pawan Kumar, DAG, Punjab.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
3. Disposed of as infructuous.
at liberty to move an appropriate application, if cause survives.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
08.05.2024
anju
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Anju Goel 2024.05.08 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
MALKIAT SINGH AND ORS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
