Retired Punjab Police constable sought ACP benefits at par with juniors, claiming higher pension disparity. State counsel assured the court that the jurisdictional authority would consider his grievance and pass an appropriate order within three months; petition disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CWP-10524-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
124
CWP-10524-2024 Date of Decision : 07.05.2024
MAKHAN SINGH
… PETITIONER
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Mr.J.S.Mohri, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
Anju Goel 2024.05.07 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
2
CWP-10524-2024
disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE
07.05.2024
anju
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Anju Goel 2024.05.07 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CWP-10524-2024
3
Anju Goel 2024.05.07 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the retired Punjab Police officer is entitled to Assured Career Progression Scheme benefits at par with his juniors.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Makhan Singh
State of Punjab
Jagmohan Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
