Pensioners sought enhancement of commutation value of pension per a 1998 notification, claiming multiplier of 15 and 40% of basic pay. The court noted an earlier judgment and dismissed LPA had already denied such relief, and dismissed the petition.
None granted; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CWP-14642-2001 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
352
CWP-14642-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision : 08.05.2024
BADBHAG SINGH AND ORS
… PETITIONERS
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Pawan Kumar, DAG, Punjab.
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
Anju Goel 2024.05.08 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
2
CWP-14642-2001 (O&M)
dismissed.
08.05.2024
anju
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
Anju Goel 2024.05.08 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioners' pension should be commuted using multiplier 15 and 40% of basic pay instead of 33%, per the 21.07.1998 notification?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
T.R. Singla and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and orsFollowed
T.R. Singla and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors
1 provisions across 1 enactments
BADBHAG SINGH AND ORS
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS
JAGMOHAN BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
