Disposed

Sunil Kumar v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC12 Jan 2024CWP/740/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a writ petition by directing the Director, Elementary Education, Haryana, to consider the petitioner's legal notice regarding pay escalation and issue a speaking order within three months, or pay costs.

What did the court decide?

Direction to consider petitioner's legal notice and pass a speaking order within 3 months; failing which, payment of Rs. 25,000 costs.

Sunil Kumar Vs State of Haryana and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

CWP No.740 of 2024

¶2

2024:PHHC:003955

¶3

-1-

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

127

¶6

¶7

CWP No.740 of 2024 Date of Decision : 12.1.2024

Sunil Kumar

..... Petitioner

versus

State of Haryana and others

¶12

..... Respondents

¶13

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA

¶14

Present: Mr. Sandeep Thakan, Advocate, for the petitioner

¶15

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana

¶16

TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J. (ORAL):

¶17

This petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to step-up the pay of the petitioner at par to his juniors and release all the consequential benefits accrued in his favour.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case his legal notice dated 8.9.2023, Annexure P-9, is considered by the respondents in a specified period.

¶19

Notice of motion.

¶20

��, appearing on advance notice, contends that the pending legal notice shall be considered and decided in the light of facts stated therein expeditiously.

¶21

In view thereof, without going into the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent/Director, Elementary/Primary Education, Haryana, to consider and decide the

¶22

Ashwani Kumar 2024.01.12 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶23

CWP No.740 of 2024

¶24

-22024:PHHC:003955

¶25

petitioner’s pending legal notice dated 8.9.2023, by passing a speaking order thereupon in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.

¶26

In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of Rs.25,000/- to the petitioner.

¶27

(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE

¶28

12.1.2024

¶29

A��w��

¶30

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No

¶31

Ashwani Kumar 2024.01.12 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Sunil Kumar v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurnam Ram Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Savita Arora Vs Maharishi Dayanand Univ. and Anr.

Sandeep Kumar Vs Haryana Staff Selection Commission and Anr.

Mahender Singh Vs State of Haryana and Others

Sanjeev Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

Sonia Vs State of Haryana and Others