Widow sought counting of her husband's 9 years 4 months 10 days army service as qualifying service combined with CISF service for pension. The claim had already been rejected by order dated 16.04.2019; petitioner withdrew the petition with liberty to challenge that rejection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
113
CWP-6668-2024 Date of decision: 18.11.2024
Manjit Kaur
....Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and Others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. Tarun Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Neha Sharma, Sr. Panel Counsel for the respondent-UOI.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
18.11.2024 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
HAMANT 2024.11.18 17:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Manjit Kaur
Union of India
AMAN CHAUDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
