Petition sought quashing of an order and direction to pay interest on amounts deposited in the petitioner's GPF account. Counsel was unable to establish contact with his client; the Court disposed of the petition with liberty to seek revival if need arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
461 CWP-14022-2003 Date of decision: 18.11.2024
Jai Pal Gupta
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Ha r yana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: H ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMA N CHAUDHARY
Present : Mr. Mayank Garg, Advocate f o r Mr. Raman B. Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Tapan Kumar DAG, Hary a na.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
establish c o ntact with his client.
revived, in c ase need arises.
���������� ���� ������������������ ������������� ��������� �����
���� � �������������������������������� ���� � �������������� �����������������
PARVEEN KUMAR 2024.11.18 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
Jai Pal Gupta
State of Haryana
AMAN CHAUDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
