Single-line oral order where the court disposed of a writ petition before the bench, reserving the petitioners' liberty to revive the plea regarding the quashing of a promotion order if needed in the future.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
488 CWP-18681-2003 Date of decision: 18.11.2024
Hawa Sing h Malik and Anr.
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Ha r yana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: H ON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMA N CHAUDHARY
Present : Mr. Ramesh Hooda, Advocate , for the petitioners.
Mr. Tapan Kumar DAG, Hary a na.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
revived, in c ase need arises.
18.11.2024
�������������
���� ������������������
��������� �����
���� � �������������������������������� ���� � �������������� �����������������
PARVEEN KUMAR 2024.11.18 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
Hawa Sing Malik and Anr.
State of Haryana and others
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
